SaaS pricing is broken. It’s time to pay per transaction, not per head

4 min read
Productivity & Digitalization

Introduction: The SaaS Value Dilemma In the world of Software as a Service (SaaS), pricing is more than just a number, it’s a direct statement about how a company delivers and captures value. For decades, the industry relied on models that felt safe but were fundamentally misaligned with customer success. Today, thanks to advancements in cloud technology, API connectivity, and AI, that old paradigm is breaking. The future of SaaS pricing is transparent, flexible, and tied directly to the outcome a client achieves. This evolution is particularly crucial for logistics, finance, and trade management platforms like Fincargo, where value is measured in successful transactions, not seated employees. This article explores the historical roots of SaaS pricing, their inherent flaws, and the technology-driven shift toward the modern, transactional model.

The Historical Era of Predictability

The evolution of software pricing mirrors the evolution of technology delivery itself. Before the cloud, software was sold via Perpetual Licenses, a single, massive upfront payment, followed by annual maintenance fees. This model created huge revenue spikes for vendors but was rigid, opaque, and entirely focused on the vendor's financial structure.

The Rise of the Subscription and its Flaws

When SaaS emerged in the early 2000s, it introduced the subscription model, primarily through Per-User (Seat-Based) Pricing and Tiered Subscriptions.

These models brought predictability, but came with serious drawbacks:

Per-User (Seat-Based) Pricing:

  • The Strength: Offers simple budgeting and predictable, fixed monthly revenue for the vendor.
  • The Weakness (Misalignment with Value): Forces customers to pay for employees who use the tool rarely, or to limit access to save money, thereby hindering internal adoption and growth.

Tiered Pricing (Good/Better/Best):

  • The Strength: Allows for market segmentation with various feature packages.
  • The Weakness (Feature Walling): Customers are often forced into expensive upper tiers for just one critical feature they need, resulting in them paying for dozens of unused functionalities.

The scientific consensus on this model is clear: While per-seat pricing offers financial predictability, it creates an artificial ceiling on growth. Customers who derive immense value from the platform are often penalized by a rigid price, while those who under-utilize it are overpaying. This leads to higher churn and limits the viral adoption necessary for modern product-led growth strategies.

The Technology-Driven Revolution: The Usage-Based Model

The widespread adoption of cloud infrastructure, powerful APIs, and recent leaps in automation (AI) has rendered the per-user model obsolete for many high-growth SaaS sectors. These technologies allow value to be delivered by the system rather than a person. The result is a paradigm shift to Usage-Based Pricing (UBP), also known as Consumption-Based or Transactional Pricing.

What changed? The value metric moved from "access" (a seat) to "consumption" (a transaction, a module, an API call). Companies like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Snowflake pioneered this approach, charging customers based on the computational resources they actually consume.

Strengths of Transactional (Usage-Based) Pricing

Perfect Alignment with Value: The customer only pays when they are actively succeeding. If they process 100 shipments, they pay for 100 shipments. If their volume is low, their cost is low. Value received equals price paid.

Lower Barrier to Entry: Startups and smaller clients can begin using the product at a minimal cost, removing the need for a massive upfront commitment. This fuels faster adoption and account expansion.

Scalability and Shared Success: The vendor's revenue growth is organically tied to the customer’s operational growth. When the customer wins, the vendor wins. This model is proven to lead to a higher Net Dollar Retention rate among leading SaaS companies.

The Challenge

The primary academic and operational criticism of UBP is the risk of "Sticker Shock," where unexpected high usage leads to an unbudgeted bill, causing customer dissatisfaction and potential churn.

The solution, adopted by leading UBP companies, is transparency. This requires real-time usage tracking, clear rate cards, and automated alerts to keep customers in control of their spending, a commitment that separates modern leaders from traditional vendors.

Fincargo’s Commitment to Transactional Transparency

The modern logistics and trade finance environment demands flexibility and cost-efficiency. It cannot afford to pay high fixed fees for features that sit idle during slow months. It needs a platform where costs are directly proportional to business activity.

This is the philosophy behind Fincargo’s pricing model. By adopting a transactional/usage-based structure, Fincargo eliminates the wasted spend inherent in legacy per-user subscription models.

For Fincargo, value is in the flow, not the headcount:

  • You don't pay for idle seats; you pay when a shipment is created.
  • You don't pay for features you ignore; you pay for the specific document processing or invoicing tasks you execute
  • You don't pay for potential; you pay for realized transactions.

We believe the most ethical and powerful pricing model is one where our success is an echo of yours. You should feel empowered to use the system without fear of fixed costs, scaling up and down based on your real-world trade volume.

Ready for a pricing model that scales with your success, not your headcount? Your first transaction is waiting. See fair, transparent pricing now at www.fincargo.ai

Share: